Exchange Server deployment strategies for SMBs
Planning an Exchange Server deployment is seldom easy, regardless of company size, but smaller
companies typically have a tougher time of it. In addition to the usual Exchange Server deployment
challenges, smaller companies often have to deal with small budgets and an IT staff that is already
stretched too thin.
Furthermore, much of the deployment-related documentation for Exchange Server assumes that
Exchange Server will be deployed in a huge organization; it therefore stresses a distributed
deployment with lots of individual servers. These distributed deployments just aren't an option for
most small, resource-strapped companies.
But there are techniques small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) can use when deploying
Exchange Server to improve cost effectiveness
When you register, you’ll also receive targeted alerts from my team of editorial writers and independent industry experts with the latest news, tips, and advice to help you do your job more efficiently and effectively. Our goal is to keep you informed on the hottest topics and biggest challenges faced by Exchange professionals today working with Exchange, Outlook and other related technologies.
Margie Semilof, Editorial Director
Premium Access
Register now for unlimited access to our premium content across our network of over 70 information Technology web sites.
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States.
Privacy
Dig Deeper
-
People who read this also read...
This was first published in March 2007
and availability.
Consider all your options
If you have a really small organization, one way of saving some money is to invest in
Small Business Server (SBS) rather than purchasing Windows Server 2003 and Exchange Server
separately.
I admit that I've never been a big fan of Small Business Server because it requires you to run
all the Microsoft server products on the same box (you don't have to install any product that you
aren't planning on using). Even so, Small Business Server is ideal for some organizations.
Before you invest in Small Business Server though, you need to be aware of its limitations. For
starters, SBS is only appropriate for organizations with fewer than 75 users. Technically, it
allows you to have as many user accounts as you want -- but you are limited to 75 concurrent
connections.
Another serious limitation is in the hardware that Small Business Server can run on. An SBS
server can have a maximum of two physical processors (or four logical processors).
A traditional Exchange Server deployment
Since Small Business Server is, more or less, a self-contained Exchange Server solution, I don't
want to spend too much time talking about it. Instead, I want to spend the remainder of this
article talking about some deployment strategies for organizations that opt for the Standard
Edition or Enterprise Edition of Exchange Server 2003.
Exchange Server performs optimally when it is deployed in a distributed manner. However, large,
distributed deployments are expensive from both a hardware and software standpoint. Besides, such
large and complex deployments are usually overkill for smaller organizations.
That being the case, I want to start out by talking about the smallest possible Exchange Server
deployment, and work my way up to something that is a little more practical, while still being
relatively cost-effective.
A tiny Exchange Server deployment
If you want to perform an absolute minimal Exchange Server deployment, you can set up a single
domain controller on your network, and install Exchange Server on it. This technique does work, but
it's a bad idea.
The main reason why this type of deployment isn't recommended is because you're putting all your
eggs in one basket. If that server fails, not only do you lose Microsoft Exchange, but you also
lose your organization's only domain controller.
I also don't recommend this type of deployment, because it tends to perform poorly. If you are
running Exchange Server on your organization's only domain controller, that domain controller will
also be acting as a global catalog server -- and most likely as a DNS server as well. All of these
services running simultaneously can place a real strain on the server and cause performance
issues.
There are a million other reasons why I don't advise placing Exchange Server on a domain
controller, but I'll just mention one more here: finances.
If you are going to place Exchange Server on a domain controller, you are probably just as well
off buying Small Business Server. SBS is basically a domain controller that is set up to run
Microsoft server products, such as Exchange Server, but at a lower licensing cost.
A more practical Exchange Server deployment
Of all of the problems involved in deploying Exchange Server on your organization's one and only
domain controller, the most serious is the issue of having a single point of failure.
Unfortunately, there is no way of totally eliminating a single point of failure without
purchasing an Exchange Server cluster or some other high-availability solution. However, you can
greatly reduce your chances of catastrophe by using three servers instead of one.
I recommend you install Exchange Server on a member server, rather than a domain controller. I
also suggest you configure the other two servers to act as domain controllers. If one domain
controller fails, the other will still be available.
Global catalogs
Exchange Server is dependent on the global catalog server, as is Windows. If fact, if your
workstations can't contact a global catalog server, your users may not even be able to log in.
By default, the first domain controller that you bring online will act as a global catalog
server. However, if that domain controller fails, you'll have no global catalog servers on your
network. Therefore, I think that it makes sense to designate the other domain controller to act as
global catalog server too.
Please keep in mind that the recommendations I am making here are only appropriate for SMBs. If
you have a larger organization with more than two domain controllers, you can designate each domain
controller to act as a global catalog server -- but you can really hurt performance if you do.
Each global catalog server has a certain amount of replication traffic associated with it.
Having at least one global catalog server is a requirement; having two is a good idea; having more
than two global catalog servers in a single domain can hurt performance on slow or congested
networks.
Designating a domain controller to act as a global catalog server is simple:
- Open the Active Directory Sites and Services container.
- Navigate through the console tree to Active Directory Sites and Services -> Sites ->
Default-First-Site-Name -> Servers -> your server -> NTDS Settings.
- Right click on the NTDS Settings container and select Properties.
- Select the Global Catalog checkbox and click OK.
DNS
Active Directory requires at least one DNS server on your network. If you don't already have a
DNS server, Windows will automatically install the DNS services on the first domain controller
brought online.
Active Directory cannot function without DNS. Likewise, Exchange Server uses DNS to resolve
addresses. Even end users utilize DNS every time they access the Internet or attempt to attach to a
host on your network.
Because DNS is one of your network's most critical services, it doesn't make sense to isolate it
to a single server. Just as it's a good idea to configure both domain controllers to act as global
catalog servers, you should configure both domain controllers to act as DNS servers. Then, if one
DNS server fails, the other can pick up the slack. (Again, this only applies to SMBs with two
domain controllers.)
Unfortunately, configuring a second DNS server isn't quite as easy as designating a server to
act as a global catalog server. Since the DNS services aren't installed by default (except for on
the first domain controller in the domain), the first step in the process is to install the DNS
services onto the domain controller that needs it:
- Go to Control Panel -> Add or Remove Programs.
- Click the Add/ Remove Windows Components button.
- Select the Networking Services option from the list of available components and click the
Details button.
- Select the Domain Name System (DNS) checkbox and click OK.
- Click Next and Windows will begin copying the necessary files. You may be prompted to insert
your Windows Server 2003 installation CD.
- When the file copy process completes, click Finish.
Now that the DNS services are installed, you must configure them to act as a secondary DNS
server for your network:
- Go to Administrative Tools -> DNS.
- Right click on the listing for your server in the DNS management console and select the
"Configure a DNS Server" command to launch the Configure a DNS Server Wizard.
- Click Next to see a screen asking what type of zone you would like to create.
- Select the option to create a forward lookup zone, and click Next.
- You will now see a screen that asks which DNS server maintains your primary zone. Select the
option indicating that an ISP maintains the zone and that a read-only secondary copy resides on
this server. Click Next to continue.
- You will now be prompted to enter the name of the zone. In a Windows Server environment, the
name of the zone is usually the same as your domain name. You can check your primary DNS server to
be sure.
- Click Next, and you will be prompted to enter the IP address for the DNS server from which you
want to copy the zone information. Put in the IP address for your primary DNS server and click
Next.
- You will now see a screen asking if the DNS server should forward queries. That way, if the DNS
server is unable to resolve a query, it can forward the query to a DNS server that is more likely
to be able to resolve the query. Typically the forward address is your ISP's DNS server, since your
DNS server isn't likely to be able to resolve many Internet-based domain names on its own.
- Click Next, followed by Finish.
- Now wait a few minutes and look under the new DNS server's Forward Lookup Zones to make sure
that zone information has been successfully copied from your other DNS server.
You have now created a redundant DNS server. One thing to keep in mind is that none of your
computers will be able to use this DNS server until you tell them they can. You must configure your
DHCP server (if you have one) so that it makes clients aware of the IP address of your secondary
DNS server. If you have any hosts with static IP addresses, you will have to add the secondary DNS
server's IP address to the machine's TCP/IP configuration manually.
About the author: Brien M. Posey, MCSE, is a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional for his
work with Exchange Server, and has previously received Microsoft's MVP award for Windows Server and
Internet Information Server (IIS). Brien has served as CIO for a nationwide chain of hospitals and
was once responsible for the Department of Information Management at Fort Knox. As a freelance
technical writer, Brien has written for Microsoft, TechTarget, CNET, ZDNet, MSD2D, Relevant
Technologies and other technology companies. You can visit Brien's personal Web site at http://www.brienposey.com.
Do you have comments on this tip? Let
us know.
Related information from SearchExchange.com:
Disclaimer:
Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.