Home > Microsoft Exchange Tips > Exchange Server Administration Tips > Pros and cons of multiple Exchange Server organizations
Exchange Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

EXCHANGE SERVER ADMINISTRATION TIPS

Pros and cons of multiple Exchange Server organizations


Brien M. Posey
01.19.2006
Rating: -4.75- (out of 5)


Exchange Server tips, tutorials and expert advice
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google


Please let others know how useful this tip is via the rating scale at the end of it. Do you have a useful Exchange or Outlook tip, timesaver or workaround to share? Submit it to our tip contest and you could win a prize.


With Exchange Server, you are limited to one Exchange organization per forest, and an Exchange organization cannot span multiple forests. This limitation can cause problems in a multi-forest deployment -- but there are advantages to consider as well.

In this tip, I explain those advantages and discuss drawbacks you should also consider before deploying a multiple-forest Windows architecture.

Advantages of Exchange Server in a multi-forest deployment

From a Microsoft Exchange perspective, the most obvious advantage of a multi-forest deployment is that you can achieve true separation of administrative responsibilities.

As an Exchange administrator, this means that you don't have to worry about an administrator from a different forest tampering with your Exchange servers. Best of all, you never have to worry about having an administrator from another forest seizing control of your local forest.

Having separate forests also allows you to do things that would otherwise be impossible. One example is if you're running Exchange Server 2003 in native mode, and a newly acquired company is running Exchange 5.5 -- you can't just bring the Exchange 5.5 servers into your organization, because native mode forbids it.

There are a few different ways you could bring those Exchange 5.5 user mailboxes into your Exchange organization, but they are somewhat complicated and involve a lot of work. In a situation such as this, it is sometimes easier to let the acquired company continue to exist as its own separate forest and Exchange organization.

If users in one forest need to access data in the other forest, you could always just set up a cr...


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



RELATED CONTENT
Exchange Server Administration Tips
Remove Exchange 2003 objects from AD to install Exchange 2010
Is your Exchange 2007 hub transport server healthy?
Avoid Outlook 2007 performance issues during repairs
Developing an Exchange 2007 server role DR plan
How DSAccess service improves Exchange Server 2007 reliability
An introduction to the Exchange Remote Connectivity Analyzer tool
Monitor Exchange 2007 with disk- and RPC-related counters
DPM 2007 replica inconsistencies in Exchange databases
Track Exchange 2007 mailbox server health using database counters
Digging deeper into Exchange Server 2010

Microsoft Exchange Server and Active Directory
Remove Exchange 2003 objects from AD to install Exchange 2010
How DSAccess service improves Exchange Server 2007 reliability
Restoring user accounts and mailbox links in Active Directory
Changing email address formats in Exchange Server 2003
Restore contacts from an Exchange public folder
An introduction to the DSAccess service in Exchange Server 2007
Exchange users receiving email addressed to legacy users
Mailbox viewing problems after migrating to Exchange 2007
Installing Exchange Server 2003 and a domain controller on the same hardware
Top 10 Microsoft Exchange Server tips of 2008
Microsoft Exchange Server and Active Directory Research

Microsoft Exchange Server Database Management
Should you remove .STM files from Exchange Server 2003?
New high availability features in Exchange Server 2010
Testing a passive database for corruption in Exchange Server 2007
Database changes that enhance Exchange Server 2007 fault tolerance
Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 database recovery methods
Creating disk space for an Exchange Server 2003 priv1.edb database
Why boot an Exchange server from a storage area network (SAN)?
DetachPipe: Outlook add-in tool saves and restores email attachments
How to calculate white space in an Exchange streaming (.STM) file
An affordable Exchange Server database backup software option for SMBs

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
User Principal Name  (SearchExchange.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary


oss-forest trust that would allow them to do so. You could maintain the separate forests indefinitely, or until you could get everybody on the same version of Exchange Server.

Disadvantages of Exchange Server in a multi-forest deployment

The separation imposed by a multi-forest deployment can be a management headache for organizations with multiple Exchange Server organizations, but only one Exchange administrator.

The disadvantages go beyond management issues though. In Microsoft Exchange, users with mailboxes in different forests are treated as outsiders. For example, a user cannot delegate mailbox access to a user with an account in a separate forest.

And since Exchange is completely dependent on Active Directory, which is limited by a forest's boundaries, users in one forest cannot access mailboxes in another forest. (A mailbox is simply an attribute of a user account, so user objects and mailboxes always stay together.)

Calendaring is also affected by multi-forest deployments. If a user wants to schedule a meeting with someone in a different forest, they can use Schedule+ to synchronize free and busy times across forest boundaries and find a meeting time that works for both parties. But the user who wants to schedule the meeting cannot view a user's calendar in a different forest to see the details of that person's schedule.

Another drawback involves Outlook Web Access (OWA). Microsoft recommends running OWA in a front-end/back-end configuration; the front-end OWA server acts as a message proxy so the back-end server, which contains the information store, is never exposed to the Internet.

OWA works in a multiple forest deployment, but the front-end server can only act as a proxy for back-end servers in the same forest. This limitation also applies to Outlook Mobile Access front-end/back-end configurations.

About the author: Brien M. Posey, MCSE, is a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional for his work with Exchange Server, and has previously received Microsoft's MVP award for Windows Server and IIS. Brien has served as CIO for a nationwide chain of hospitals and was once responsible for the Department of Information Management at Fort Knox. As a freelance technical writer, Brien has written for Microsoft, TechTarget, CNET, ZDNet, MSD2D, Relevant Technologies and other technology companies. You can visit Brien's personal Web site at http://www.brienposey.com.


Do you have comments on this tip? Let us know.
Related information from the TechTarget Windows Network:

  • SearchExchange.com Ask the Expert: Building an Exchange Server resource forest
  • SearchExchange.com Ask the Expert: Synchronizing two Active Directory domains
  • SearchWin2000.com Learning Guide: Planning and designing your Active Directory
  • SearchExchange.com Reference Center: Exchange Server and Active Directory tips and resources



    Rate this Tip
    To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchExchange.com.
    Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.


    Submit a Tip




    DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.



  • Email Server Solutions: Exchange 2007, Exchange 2003, Exchange 2000, SharePoint
    HomeNewsTopicsITKnowledge ExchangeTipsAsk the ExpertsMultimediaWhite PapersIT Downloads
    About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
    SEARCH 
    TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

    TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




    All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2004 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
      TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts