To continue reading for free, register below or login
To read more you must become a member of SearchExchange.com
VIEW MEMBER FEEDBACK TO THIS ASK THE EXPERT Q&A.
Setting up a second domain controller is a great idea for redundancy of your directory (and potentially your global catalog, assuming you enabled this on the second domain controller). But installing Exchange Server on a second domain controller does not give you any ability to replicate the mailbox content to the other Exchange server. Setting up two replicated instances of a given mailbox is not possible with Exchange 5.5, Exchange 2000 or Exchange 2003.
MEMBER FEEDBACK TO THIS ASK THE EXPERT Q&A:
Why not just mirror the Exchange drive?
—Gordon H.
******************************************
My understanding is that the user is looking to replicate mailbox content for redundancy reasons. Mirroring the drive would provide a level of redundancy but the ideal story around mailbox-level redundancy is the equivalent of either Exchange 2007 Local Continuous Replication (LCR) or Clustered Continuous Replication (CCR). Native solutions don't exist for Exchange 2003, however third-party solutions such as Double-Take provide alternatives.
—David Sengupta, Exchange Administration expert
Do you have comments on this Ask the Expert Q&A? Let us know.
Related information from SearchExchange.com:
Exchange Admin 101: Exchange Server replication and synchronization
Expert Advice: Problems running Exchange 2000 on a domain controller
Expert Advice: Two-way synchronization between Exchange servers
Learning Center: Exchange Server replication remedies
Reference Center: Exchange replication and synchronization resources
Reference Center: Exchange Server deployment and migration advice
|
