It's a Windows 2000 single forest domain and all users have e-mail addresses of email@example.com. Apparently, this was doable with Exchange 5.5, but not with Exchange 2000. I installed a certificate on the "master" Exchange 2000 server and it works fine, but users whose mailboxes reside on the second server can't use it.
There are two pieces of good news I can give you. One is that certificates for your Exchange servers do not have to cost a fortune. You can shop around for cheaper third-party certificate authorities (CA), or you can even configure one of your existing servers in your domain as a Windows CA. The other good news is that the Standard Edition of Exchange Server 2003 can be used as front-end servers. This is significantly cheaper then the Enterprise Edition that we were required to use with Exchange 2000 Server. And, front-end server hardware generally does not cost nearly has much as back-end servers, because there are virtually no disk storage requirements beyond the OS and the Exchange application. Finally, Exchange 2003 front-end servers are backwards compatible with Exchange 2000 back-end servers.
Do you have comments on this Ask the Expert question and response? Let us know.
Dig deeper on Outlook Web Access
Related Q&A from Richard Luckett
Our company has users who reside outside the local area network. What's the best way to grant those users access to Outlook Web App?continue reading
When you're stumped on how to track email items following a central mailbox move, fix the dilemma by knowing what happens to items in mailboxes when ...continue reading
You can pull out the big guns to manually remove what's left of your failed Exchange Server from Active Directory, but it's best to consider ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.